When Google entered classrooms, it arrived carrying the language of innovation: tools to empower teachers, platforms to modernise learning, devices to close digital gaps. But newly uncovered internal documents, reported by NBC News, suggest a far more calculated strategy unfolding behind the scenes. The records reveal that Google viewed its expanding footprint in schools not merely as an educational mission but as a long-term business investment, one designed to familiarise children with its ecosystem early and convert them into loyal users for life.

However, the documents also point out the possible dangers of Google’s services. For example, YouTube is found to be “problematic for students” because of its dangerous content, advertisements, and comments, as well as its effect on sleep.

Nevertheless, the benefit of schools using Google’s services is still emphasized in the presentation, as in this 2020 slide: “You get that loyalty early, and potentially for life.” These findings contradict the notion that schools are a neutral ground for education, as they are now a playing field for corporate politics.

YouTube’s risks in the classroom

NBC News reported that the internal Google presentations from 2018 to 2024 acknowledged that YouTube could be unsafe and distracting for students. The survey respondents mentioned in the documents said that the platform had a negative impact on their sleep and health. However, despite these issues, the company was still looking for ways to boost engagement, such as by adding YouTube videos to educational content, which was not standardized across US school districts.

A pipeline of future users

The documents describe a clear commercial motivation behind Google’s presence in American schools. One slide asked staff to imagine a world where “Parents ask their children, ‘Why aren’t you watching more YouTube?’” and “School Administrators shift budgets from textbooks to YouTube subscriptions.” Experts cited by NBC News, including cognitive neuroscientist Jared Cooney Horvath, emphasized that such strategies highlight how companies may prioritize long-term customer loyalty over genuine educational outcomes.

Legal and ethical questions

The filings were part of a larger lawsuit in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, involving families, school districts, and state attorneys general. Plaintiffs claim that Google, together with Meta, ByteDance, and Snap, marketed addictive social media and digital services to children without sufficient warning to schools about the risks. Snap has recently settled its claim, while trials for the remaining companies will seek to determine if they had a legal or moral obligation to limit use or implement safeguards for minors.Google has denied wrongdoing. In a statement to NBC News, a spokesperson said that the documents “mischaracterize our work” and emphasized that schools control platform usage and parental consent is required for students under 18. The company also stated that YouTube content provided to schools is aligned with curriculum needs.

Google’s dominance in education

Since the launch of Chromebooks in 2011, Google has become the leading technology provider for schools in the United States. According to market research cited by NBC News, schools now account for approximately 80% of all Chromebook purchases, and over half of American public school students use Google applications for classwork. Yet internal documents show that YouTube remains challenging to use effectively for learning, often directing students to unrelated or inappropriate content. One slide described a search for “linear equations” being recommended a comedy sketch by a user named “cocksandballs123.”

The debate over digital learning

According to NBC News, education specialists and parent advocates argue that schools often adopt untested digital tools at the expense of proven analog learning methods. Advocates of educational technology counter that, when used responsibly, digital tools can enhance learning outcomes, highlighting a persistent tension in US education policy.

The need for accountability

The upcoming trial in a Kentucky school district, set for June, may test whether companies like Google are legally responsible for the risks posed by their platforms in schools. According to advocates, the documents reveal that children are being socialized into a commercial ecosystem before they are able to make informed decisions, which raises profound ethical and psychological issues. According to NBC News, this is part of a larger conversation taking place in the country about whether schools are prioritizing learning or inadvertently serving corporate interests.

Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals.

Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox.

All about ETEducation industry right on your smartphone!