Faculty groups are pushing back against Colorado State University’s decision to consider only internal candidates in its search to replace outgoing chancellor Tony Frank, The Coloradoan reported. 

The CSU Faculty Council voted to endorse a Feb. 3 letter from its executive committee to the system’s Board of Governors, which is conducting the search. 

“An internal search, for a position of this magnitude, is not only misaligned with institutional peers, [it] limits our ability to identify the best candidate. Furthermore, it fosters an impression that the slate of potential candidates is already determined,” the letter stated. “It is exceptionally concerning that the current Chancellor appears to be soliciting applications for the position, superseding the Evaluation Committee Chair or Board Chair. As the current Chancellor would have affiliations with any internal candidates, this represents a direct conflict of interest.” 

A letter from the CSU chapter of the American Association of University Professors raised similar concerns. The group also denounced the tight six-week timeline between the initial search announcement and the application deadline. The board announced Frank’s June 2027 retirement on Dec. 18, and applications for the chancellorship were due to Frank by Jan. 26. 

“From our perspective, it looks like the search is being conducted by a committee of one—the current chancellor,” Brian Munsky, a representative of the School of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering, said at a faculty council meeting, according to The Coloradoan. 

In the same Dec. 18 announcement, the board shared its plans for the internal search.

“Today, we voted to conduct an internal search for Chancellor, launching in January 2026, that will be open to anyone currently employed within the CSU System who meets the application criteria,” the board wrote. The application criteria include a terminal degree, “strong experience with government affairs” and “a record of significant accomplishment as a senior leader in a complex organization, in higher education, business, public service, government, or the non-profit sector.”