
IRS Plans to Revoke Harvard’s Tax-Exempt Status
The Internal Revenue Service is reportedly planning to rescind Harvard University’s tax-exempt status amid its showdown with the Trump administration over academic freedom, CNN reported.
Citing two anonymous sources, CNN reported that a decision is likely coming soon. If Harvard’s tax-exempt status is revoked, the move would appear to be at the behest of President Donald Trump, who has railed against the private university in posts on his own Truth Social platform.
“Perhaps Harvard should lose its Tax Exempt Status and be Taxed as a Political Entity if it keeps pushing political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting ‘Sickness?’ Remember, Tax Exempt Status is totally contingent on acting in the PUBLIC INTEREST!” Trump wrote Tuesday.
In a Wednesday post, the president said that Harvard should “no longer receive Federal Funds” because it “is a JOKE [that] teaches Hate and Stupidity.”
Harvard is currently in a standoff with the Trump administration, which has demanded a series of wide-reaching changes it says are needed to address alleged antisemitism on campus related to pro-Palestinian protests. Those demands include reforms in admissions, hiring practices, student disciplinary processes and a facultywide plagiarism review, among other changes.
Harvard, however, rejected Trump’s demands on Monday, calling them an affront to institutional autonomy.
The Trump administration promptly retaliated, freezing $2.2 billion in federal grant funding and $60 million in contracts.
The IRS did not respond to a request for comment from Inside Higher Ed.
Harvard spokesperson Jason Newton wrote by email that the government has no legal basis for revoking Harvard’s tax-exempt status.
“Such an unprecedented action would endanger our ability to carry out our educational mission,” he wrote. “It would result in diminished financial aid for students, abandonment of critical medical research programs, and lost opportunities for innovation. The unlawful use of this instrument more broadly would have grave consequences for the future of higher education in America.”
Source link